Gå til innhold

Gunnar Fidjeland

Members
 Vis profil  Se deres aktivitet

  • Innholdsteller

    767

  • Ble med

  • Siste besøk

  • Dager vunnet

    31

 Innholdstype 

Innlegg skrevet av Gunnar Fidjeland

    Captain Sim Boeing 777 200ER for MSFS Review

    i MSFS 2020 - Fly, Helikopter og AI

    Skrevet

    Captain Sim erkjenner nå at deres strategi var en dårlig ide:

     

    Sitat

    Captains,
    Thank you all for your feedback on the "liveries move".
    We must admit that was a mistake.

    From now on all free liveries for the 777-III are welcome to be posted anywhere.

    The 777-III repaint kit will be available to anyone on Monday 24MAY2021.

    We will contact flightsim.to tomorrow as well.

    We are sorry for all that mess.

    Peace,
    Captain Sim Team

    https://www.captainsim.org/forum/csf.pl?num=1621800766

     

    • Like 1

    Garmin GTN750 og Carenado

    i MSFS 2020 - Tilleggsprogrammer

    Skrevet

    Mine Carenado fly fikk nylig en oppdatering der det nå er mulig å velge GTN750 (freeware fra PMS50) fra cockpit'en.

     

    Sitat

    GTN750 option added
    The following aircraft have been updated with the option to have the GTN750 from pms50.com :
    PA34T Seneca V
    PA28R Arrow III
    PA44 Seminole
    M20R Ovation
    New versions of them are already available at Microsoft Marketplace.

    care0521.jpg

     

    GTN750 blir bare bedre og bedre ....

    GTN750 Basic (freeware) kan lastes ned her:   

    https://pms50.com/msfs/

     

    gtn750_beta.png

     

     

     

    • Like 1

    Britten-Norman BN-2 Islander to MSFS Soon

    i MSFS 2020 - Fly, Helikopter og AI

    Skrevet

    1 time siden skrev Frank Kristiansen:

    ... men styrer unna når jeg leser anmeldelser av selskapet

    Personlig har jeg ingen erfaring med Black Box Simulation - men forstår at mange ikke er fornøyd med tidligere kjøp. Jeg kan i den forbindelse vise til hva Kenneth James Kerr blant annet skriver om det du nevner - i sin anmeldelse av Britten-Norman Islander BN-2:

    Sitat

    Now, I am not going to judge people for their feelings because their experiences might be different from mine. But what I will say is that I have read the developer’s responses to the accusations on the MSFS forum, and he is willing to clarify issues with those who feel such afront.

    But where I respectfully suggest that a line is crossed is when people suggest that customers avoid this developer’s current projects because of past grievances.

    Here’s my personal “KerrSpective” on that.

    1. To accept that the past equals the future is to negate the possibility of evolution and improvement. Any alleged mistakes of the past (in any person’s life), only have lasting influence if no lessons are learned. We must carefully refrain from assuming that perceived past errors will be repeated.
    2. It may be counter-productive to suggest that people boycott the developer’s current projects. Think about it. If a person wants a past project to be supported, it is wiser to encourage their newer ones, because only by doing so will the revenue be there for the developer to “circle back” to the older ones. If a business dies due to lack of support for new projects, the older projects will never get improved or be supported!
    3. Those who boycott current projects are not going to witness the current methodologies of the developer because they are not experiencing them. It’s like judging a 2021 car because a 1980’s car from the same manufacturer disappointed you.
    4. While some people passionately complain about past products, many others are enjoying the newer products. The Bird Dog is a great example. Yes, it started out as being a little weak upon its MSFS launch, and some criticism was well justified. BUT it has grown into a fine product through constant improvement and dedication on the part of the developer, and many people are having a total blast with it, myself included.
    5. In the end, every developer gains ground or loses it based on a product-by-product experience. At this time the developer is spending a lot of time evolving his business to support the platform that is the future of the industry. To do otherwise would be commercial folly. Let us, therefore, allow him to evolve and grow into the new sim, and judge his MSFS progress based on his MSFS products as they are released.

    Once again, I understand that some members of the community have been upset in the past. However, in my eyes, the developer is really working hard to ensure the sustainability of his business. And I for one am willing to encourage his efforts. As one who knows how hard this industry can be, I want him to survive and serve us with interesting products for years to come. Encouragement will do that. Criticism and vitriol won’t.

    https://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/content.php?22507-KerrSpectives-The-Islander/view/1

     

    • Like 1

    Freeware og distribusjon

    i Kaffekroken

    Skrevet

    Ja, Google er nazi. Jeg har forsøkt flere ganger å komme i kontakt med Google for å sjekke hvordan dette "uleselige"skal tolkes - men uten å lykkes.  De fleste av oss gir derfor blaffen og tolker det i beste mening - i vår favør.

    For noen år siden fulgte jeg en lignende debatt på forumet til Aerofly. Der kom det positivt svar fra Bing (Microsoft):

    Sitat

    I checked with Microsoft's legal area and surprisingly they responded. I assumed they'd just ignore it. They advised they had no issue with sharing anything created using their map data.

    9659-bing-maps-approval-jpg

     

    Sitat

    If you don't ask you don't get. Unlike Bing, Google's voluminous legal fluff basically said "Don't contact us".

    Jeg har ikke hørt om noen som er blitt kontaktet av Google på grunn av freeware til flysimulatorene. Og hvis noen skulle bli kontaktet - så si i fra at jeg fortsatt ønsker en prat ..... 🤣

    https://www.aerofly.com/community/forum/index.php?thread/13194-australian-scenery-screenshots/&postID=64029#post64029

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Opprett ny...