Stian_Monssen

Tror SQ flyr 772ER på hele den ruten, flydd samme rute noen ganger jeg selv! Men ikke så stor forskjell på motorene uansett, om jeg ikke tar helt feil! Husker spesielt en gang da jeg satt helt bak, utrolig hvor mye mer bråk det er under take off, enn om du sitter framme. Trodde rett og slett det var noe gale!

Hva betyr det egentlig når noen skriver slik? Har sett det før men har ikke tenkt over hva det betyr!

Bra Micheal, meget utfyldende! tenkete meg det var du som kom til å svare på den. Hva kan du si om A346HGW, den hadde sin første tur idag. Klarer den kampen mot 777ER/LR??

Stemmer det ikke at boeing fikk bra med støtte av japanske flyselskap som ANA og JAL for utviklingen av 787, og tar jeg ikke feil er et av de delvis eid av japanske mydigheter. Og japan og usa har et merkverdig handelfordeler til hverandre, spesielt innen luftfart industrien. Alstå en form for skult subsidier til utviklingen av 787. Poenget er at det fins subsidier til begge flyprodusenter, men airbus sine er mye mer åpenbare. Jeg skal ikke banne på at alt dette stemmer, men det er utsagnt fra folk som jobber og eksperter i industrien, og spekuleringer på airliner.net, som jeg vet vi skal ta med en klype salt! Skulle alt gått riktig for seg, hadde det ikke vært noen form for subsidier der ute. Men hadde ikke Airbus fått statsstøtte, tror jeg boeing ville til slutt ha hat monopol på flyindustrien. Siden lockheed martin trakk seg fra det kommersielle markedet og MD ble oppkjøpt av boeing. Jeg tror at skal det være to store flyprodusenter der ute måtte det bygges opp et med statsstøtte. Håper og tror med tiden at statsstøtten forsvinner med når A380 prosjeketet begynner å tjene penger. Slik at en skikkelig konkuranse kan begynne.

håper noen av airbusene begynner å fly innenriks i norge i framtiden. begynner å bli drita lei av å altid reise med 737. Bor rett ved flesland, hadde hvert kjekt å se A319 i sas farger på innflygningen. Ser ut som sas vil satse på airbus i framtiden. Som airbus fan håper jeg det abselutt blir tilfelle.

Tror nok airbus vil klare det ganske bra med A350. kan godt være den blir også bedre, siden den kommer ut 2010 med bedre teknologi på motor, ving og etc. Husk at airbus selger flere fly enn boeing de siste årene, så de kan tydligvis konkurere med boeing..

Nope, hadde flyet fløye sidelengs, så ja. Det vil på langt nær bidra så mye som krafta fra trykketforskjellen bidrar. Når du åpner døra i en bil åpner du den mot luftstrømmen. Åpner du en nødutgang/dør på et fly, åpner du den innover, ikke i nærheten i noen luftstrøm som kan påvirke bevegelsen. Det er med god grunn at dørene er konstruert slik de er, for at trykket skal holde dem på plass while airborne. skjekk dette bildet, link Ser no ut som disse dørene går utover. Tror ikke jeg hadde klart å åpne disse dørene i fart.

Har vell også med farten på flyet og å gjøre. Prøv å åpne bildøren i fart på 60 km/t. Nesten ikke mulig. prøv da i 850 km/t!! Selv om det er lavere trykk utenfor flyet. Har ikke den så mye å si lengre i høy fart.

Sikkert en teroetisk mulighet at dette kan skje. Men det som trolig har skjedd er at flyet ikke klarte å stoppe i tide. Som passasjernen har sagt, var det som en berg og dalbane under innflygningen. Flyet landet også svært langt inn på rullebanen. Med stressete piloter og lysten på å komme fram, samt til våt rullebane, skjer det lett ulykker. Dette har skjedd mange ganger før!

Boeing 777 flyr også med "fly by wire" altså av en datamaskin. Men det er ikke bare en datamaskin i disse flyene, det er tre stykk om jeg ikke tar feil. Det vil si at skulle en gå i stykker, for ekslempel av lyn, tar den andre over. " fly by wire" er sikrene enn masse wire rund i flyet. Boeing hadde tenkt å brukt "fly by wire" på sin nye 737NG, men det ble for dyrt, og måtte gå igjennom masse godkjenninger før flyene hadde blitt godkjent. Derfor fly 737NG med vanlige wire.

Her har du de! Rank 2002 --- City --- Airport Code --- Total Passengers --- % Change --- Country 1 --- Atlanta --- ATL --- 76,876,128 --- 1.3 --- US 2 --- Chicago (O'Hare) --- ORD --- 66,565,952 --- (1.3) --- US 3 --- London (Heathrow) --- LHR --- 63,338,641 --- 4.3 --- United Kingdom 4 --- Tokyo (Haneda) --- HND --- 61,079,478 --- 4.1 --- Japan 5 --- Los Angeles --- LAX --- 56,223,843 --- (8.7) --- US 6 --- Dallas (DFW) --- DFW --- 52,828,573 --- (4.2) --- US 7 --- Frankfurt --- FRA --- 48,450,357 --- (0.2) --- Germany 8 --- Paris (Charles de Gaulle) --- CDG --- 48,350,172 --- 0.7 --- France 9 --- Amsterdam --- AMS --- 40,736,009 --- 3.0 --- Netherlands 10 --- Denver --- DEN --- 35,651,098 --- (1.2) --- US 11 --- Phoenix --- PHX --- 35,547,167 --- 0.3 --- US 12 --- Las Vegas (LAS) --- LAS --- 35,009,011 --- (0.5) --- US 13 --- Madrid --- MAD --- 33,913,456 --- (0.4) --- Spain 14 --- Houston (Intercontinental) --- IAH --- 33,905,253 --- (2.6) --- US 15 --- Hong Kong --- HKG --- 33,882,463 --- 4.1 --- China 16 --- Minneapolis --- MSP --- 32,628,331 --- (3.3) --- US 17 --- Detroit --- DTW --- 32,477,694 --- (0.5) --- US 18 --- Bangkok --- BKK --- 32,182,980 --- 5.1 --- Thailand 19 --- San Francisco --- SFO --- 31,456,422 --- (9.2) --- US 20 --- Miami --- MIA --- 30,060,241 --- (5.1) --- US 21 --- New York (JFK) --- JFK --- 29,943,084 --- 2.0 --- US 22 --- London (Gatwick) --- LGW --- 29,628,423 --- (5.0) --- United Kingdom 23 --- Newark --- EWR --- 29,202,654 --- (6.1) --- US 24 --- Singapore --- SIN --- 28,979,344 --- 3.2 --- Singapore 25 --- Tokyo (Narita) --- NRT --- 28,883,606 --- 13.8 --- Japan 26 --- Beijing --- PEK --- 27,159,665 --- 12.3 --- China 27 --- Seattle --- SEA --- 26,690,843 --- (1.3) --- US 28 --- Orlando (MCO) --- MCO --- 26,653,672 --- (5.7) --- US 29 --- Toronto --- YYZ --- 25,930,363 --- (7.5) --- Canada 30 --- St. Louis --- STL --- 25,626,114 --- (3.9) --- US 31 --- Rome --- FCO --- 25,340,383 --- (0.9) --- Italy 32 --- Philadelphia --- PHL --- 24,799,470 --- 1.0 --- US 33 --- Charlotte --- CLT --- 23,597,926 --- 1.8 --- US 34 --- Paris (Orly) --- ORY --- 23,169,725 --- 0.6 --- France 35 --- Munich --- MUC --- 23,163,720 --- (2.0) --- Germany 36 --- Sydney --- SYD --- 22,797,724 --- (7.9) --- Australia 37 --- Boston --- BOS --- 22,696,141 --- (7.3) --- US 38 --- New York (La Guardia) --- LGA --- 21,986,679 --- (2.4) --- US 39 --- Barcelona --- BCN --- 21,345,090 --- 2.9 --- Spain 40 --- Seoul (Incheon) --- ICN --- 21,057,093 --- 44.4 --- South Korea 41 --- Cincinnati --- CVG --- 20,812,642 --- 20.5 --- US 42 --- Mexico City --- MEX --- 20,521,147 --- (0.4) --- Mexico 43 --- Honolulu --- HNL --- 19,749,905 --- (2.0) --- US 44 --- Fukuoka --- FUK --- 19,523,495 --- (0.3) --- Japan 45 --- Taipei --- TPE --- 19,228,411 --- 4.2 --- Taiwan 46 --- Manchester, UK --- MAN --- 19,022,485 --- (2.7) --- United Kingdom 47 --- Baltimore --- BWI --- 19,012,529 --- (6.7) --- US 48 --- Sapporo --- CTS --- 18,832,451 --- 2.4 --- Japan 49 --- Salt Lake City --- SLC --- 18,647,997 --- (0.9) --- US 50 --- Copenhagen --- CPH --- 18,197,606 --- 0.9 --- Denmark 51 --- Pittsburgh --- PIT --- 18,027,165 --- (9.6) --- US 52 --- Zurich --- ZRH --- 17,902,073 --- (14.6) --- Switzerland 53 --- Palma De Mallorca --- PMI --- 17,828,762 --- (7.2) --- Spain 54 --- Osaka (Itami) --- ITM --- 17,627,571 --- 4.4 --- Japan 55 --- Milan --- MXP --- 17,441,250 --- (6.1) --- Italy 56 --- Osaka (Kansai) --- KIX --- 17,373,731 --- (10.3) --- Japan 57 --- Chicago (Midway) --- MDW --- 17,371,036 --- 10.8 --- US 58 --- Seoul (Gimpo) --- GMP --- 17,092,095 --- (22.5) --- South Korea 59 --- Washington (Dulles) --- IAD --- 17,075,965 --- (4.4) --- US 60 --- Ft. Lauderdale --- FLL --- 17,037,261 --- 3.8 --- US 61 --- Melbourne --- MEL --- 16,739,017 --- (1.3) --- Australia 62 --- Stockholm --- ARN --- 16,537,332 --- (9.6) --- Sweden 63 --- Guangzhou --- CAN --- 16,423,878 --- 15.0 --- China 64 --- Kuala Lumpur --- KUL --- 16,398,230 --- 12.8 --- Malaysia 65 --- London (Stanstead) --- STN --- 16,049,288 --- 17.5 --- United Kingdom 66 --- Dubai --- DXB --- 15,973,391 --- 18.3 --- United Arab Emirates 67 --- Tampa --- TPA --- 15,494,668 --- (2.5) --- US 68 --- Vancouver --- YVR --- 15,088,216 --- (3.6) --- Canada 69 --- Dublin --- DUB --- 15,084,667 --- 5.2 --- Ireland 70 --- San Diego --- SAN --- 14,931,854 --- (1.7) --- US 71 --- Jakarta --- CGK --- 14,830,994 --- 25.5 --- Indonesia 72 --- Dusseldorf --- DUS --- 14,745,325 --- (4.2) --- Germany 73 --- Brussels --- BRU --- 14,413,795 --- (26.8) --- Belgium 74 --- Shanghai (Hongqiao) --- SHA --- 13,705,378 --- (1.1) --- China 75 --- Oslo --- OSL --- 13,441,885 --- (3.7) --- Norway 76 --- Istanbul --- IST --- 13,357,363 --- (8.3) --- Turkey 77 --- Oakland --- OAK --- 13,005,642 --- 11.0 --- US 78 --- Washington (National) --- DCA --- 12,871,885 --- (2.3) --- US 79 --- Manila --- MNL --- 12,811,915 --- 1.5 --- Philippines 80 --- Sao Paulo (Guarulhos) --- GRU --- 12,804,091 --- (9.5) --- Brazil 81 --- Johannesburg --- JNB --- 12,743,545 --- 8.1 --- South Africa 82 --- Sao Paulo (Congonhas) --- CGH --- 12,562,319 --- 4.2 --- Brazil 83 --- Brisbane --- BNE --- 12,243,836 --- (7.3) --- Australia 84 --- Portland --- PDX --- 12,241,975 --- (3.6) --- US 85 --- Mumbai --- BOM --- 12,043,882 --- 3.7 --- India 86 --- Vienna --- VIE --- 11,973,805 --- 1.0 --- Austria 87 --- Naha (Okinawa) --- OKA --- 11,887,002 --- 7.8 --- Japan 88 --- Athens --- ATH --- 11,827,493 --- -- --- Greece 89 --- Shanghai (Pu Dong) --- PVG --- 11,283,851 --- 57.2 --- China 90 --- Memphis --- MEM --- 11,141,594 --- (5.6) --- US 91 --- San Jose --- SJC --- 11,115,778 --- (15.1) --- US 92 --- Jeddah --- JED --- 10,945,192 --- 5.6 --- Saudi Arabia 93 --- Moscow --- SVO --- 10,895,225 --- (5.8) --- Russia 94 --- Nagoya --- NGO --- 10,524,102 --- (0.5) --- Japan 95 --- Cleveland --- CLE --- 10,445,204 --- (12.0) --- US 96 --- Antalya --- AYT --- 10,424,943 --- 12.7 --- Turkey 97 --- Malaga --- AGP --- 10,420,719 --- 5.0 --- Spain 98 --- Kansas City --- MCI --- 10,279,966 --- (14.6) --- US 99 --- Jeju --- CJU --- 9,939,700 --- 6.6 --- South Korea 100 --- Berlin --- TXL --- 9,879,888 --- (0.3) --- Germany Altså er Atlanta den mest traffikerte i verden. travleste Internasjonale er Heathrow, hvor 10% av alle jumbojetene står hver morgen. Da er alle de andre widebodyene ikke regnet med.

Det stemmer nok ikke. Men My travel skal bruke A332 på den ruten.

skal kjøre på bane med motorsykkler, leid banen en helg. banen er faktisk godskjent for formel 1.

Har hørt med cost air. De tar helle 40000,- per time. litt i stiveste laget. Sendt mail til BAT. Håper de er billigere.

Noen som har reist denne ruten, billigst og enklest mulig. Vi er 18 stykk som skal av gårde allerede 11.06 Tanken har slått oss å leie fly dit, noe som har efaringer med hvordan det gjøres, og til hvilken pris?